We apply a risk-based AML framework designed to prevent the misuse of the financial system and support safe, compliant banking relationships — aligned with international good practice.
This AML policy describes core controls typically used by banks to identify, assess, monitor, and mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing risk. It is designed to support transparent onboarding, ongoing monitoring, and responsible banking operations.
The purpose of this policy is to prevent and detect money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crime. It applies to the bank, its officers, employees, contractors, and relevant third parties involved in onboarding, account servicing, payments, and related activities.
Effective AML requires clear oversight, independent challenge, and documented decisions. Senior management is responsible for ensuring adequate resources and an appropriate control environment.
A risk-based approach begins with assessing inherent risk and applying controls proportionate to that risk. Risk assessments should be performed at customer, product, channel, and geographic levels.
CDD is performed before establishing a relationship and updated throughout the relationship lifecycle. CDD aims to identify the customer, understand the purpose of the relationship, and establish an expected activity profile.
EDD is applied where higher risk is identified (e.g., complex ownership, high-risk geographies, PEPs, high-risk sectors, unusual transaction patterns, or negative media). EDD includes deeper verification, stronger approvals, and closer monitoring.
PEPs and related parties (family members and close associates) require heightened scrutiny due to increased corruption risk. The bank applies screening and applies EDD, approvals, and ongoing monitoring proportionate to risk.
The bank screens customers, beneficial owners, and (where applicable) transactions against relevant sanctions lists and watchlists. Adverse media and negative information are assessed and documented before onboarding and during relationship reviews.
Ongoing monitoring includes reviewing transactional behavior relative to the expected profile and investigating unusual activity. Monitoring can be rules-based, scenario-based, and/or analyst-driven based on data availability and risk.
If activity appears unusual or potentially suspicious, staff must escalate internally to the compliance function. Where appropriate, the bank may file a suspicious transaction/activity report in line with applicable requirements.
Records must be maintained to evidence compliance actions, customer identity, risk decisions, monitoring outcomes, and transaction investigations. Data must be accurate, complete, and retrievable for audit and regulatory needs.
AML effectiveness depends on staff awareness and consistent execution. Training is delivered on induction and refreshed periodically, with targeted training for higher-risk functions.
The AML program is subject to periodic independent review or audit to validate design and operational effectiveness. Findings are tracked and remediated with clear owners and timelines.
Depending on services offered, banks often implement additional controls for correspondent banking, trade finance, virtual assets, high-risk industries, and third-party reliance.
For AML-related inquiries, onboarding documentation requests, due diligence, or partnership compliance discussions, contact our compliance team.
Email: compliance@uninovabank.comThis page is provided for general information about common AML controls and governance practices used by banks. Specific requirements may vary by jurisdiction, products/services, and applicable regulations.